sandbox/M1EMN/Exemples/bagnoldtube.c
Bagnold flow in a pipe
We condider the flow of granular media in a horizontal tube
\displaystyle \tau = 2 \eta_{eq} D
Flow under gravity (in -e_x), with confining pressure P_0.
Un écoulement “bouchon” à vitesse constante se produit dans la majeure partie du tube, une bande de cisaillement près des parois permettent à la vitesse de passer à zéro à la paroi.
Equations d’équilibre à accélération négligée (stationnaire):
Prenons P=P_0 constant \displaystyle 0=-\frac{\partial P}{\partial r}\; et\; 0= \frac{\partial }{r \partial r} ( r \tau_{rx}) -\rho g donc, tant que \tau_{rx} < \mu_s P_0 on est dans le bouchon solide, la contrainte n’est pas assez forte pour créer un mouvement relatif. Par symétrie au centre \tau_{rx} est nul, et on peut intégrer \tau_{rx} = \rho g \frac{r}2, [remarque, en 2D plan, il n’y a pas de 1/2, et le reste de l’analyse est le même].
Pour une certaine position r=r^* on est tout juste au seuil \tau_{rx} (r=r^*) = \mu_s P_0. Ensuite, pour r>r^*, \tau_{rx} reste linéaire, mais on l’écrit: \displaystyle \tau_{xy} = \frac{1}2 \rho g (r-r^{*}) + \mu_s P_0 On a calculé la contrainte, pour r<r^* on est dans l’écoulement solide en bloc (le bouchon), pour r>r^* on est dans l’écoulement fluide donc on a \tau_{rx}=\mu(I) P et donc : \displaystyle \frac{\Delta \mu}{1+I_0/I} = \frac{1}{2 P_0} \rho g (r-r^{*}) ou après inversion de \mu(I) et intégration \displaystyle u(r) = \left(\frac{I_0 R}{ d } \sqrt{\frac{P_0}{\rho }} \right) \frac{( R-r) \frac{1}{2} \rho g + \Delta \mu P_0 Log[\frac{ \Delta \mu P_0 + \frac{1}{2 } \rho g (r^* -R)}{ \Delta \mu P_0 + \frac{1}{2} \rho g (r^*-r)}]}{ \frac{1}{2 } \rho g R}
vitesse au centre \displaystyle u(r) = \left(\frac{I_0 R}{ d } \sqrt{\frac{P_0}{\rho }} \right) \frac{( R-r^*) \frac{1}{2} \rho g + \Delta \mu P_0 Log[\frac{ \Delta \mu P_0 + \frac{1}{2 } \rho g (r^* -R)}{ \Delta \mu P_0 }]}{ \frac{1}{2 } \rho g R}
#include "axi.h"
#include "navier-stokes/centered.h"
#define LEVEL 6
double mumax,dg,P0;
scalar mu_eq[];
Bagnold solution for comparison,
double Uba( double r){
double dmu=.26,mu0=.38,I0=.3;
//double rgs2=1;//
double rgs2=1./2;
double rs=mu0*P0/rgs2;
double uu = 30*2*I0*((1 - r)*rgs2 + dmu*P0*log(rgs2*(rs-1) + dmu*P0 ) -
dmu*P0*log(dmu*P0 + rgs2*(rs-r) ));
double uup = 30*2*I0*((1 - rs)*rgs2 + dmu*P0*log(rgs2*(rs-1) + dmu*P0 ) -
dmu*P0*log(dmu*P0 + rgs2*(rs-rs) ));
return (r < rs? uup:uu ); }
Main with parameters
int main() {
L0 = 1.;
P0 = 1;
DT = 0.05;
// P0 =2;2D
the regularisation value of viscosity
mumax=5000;
Boundary conditions are periodic
periodic (right);
no slip at the top, confinment pressure P_0
u.t[top] = dirichlet(0);
u.n[top] = dirichlet(0);
p[top] = dirichlet(P0);
symmetry at the bottom
u.n[bottom] = dirichlet(0);
u.t[bottom] = neumann(0);
// stokes = true; // because U=u(y)e_x. stokes true > no CFL condition
run();
}
face vector muv[];
event init (t = 0) {
prepare viscosity
mu = muv;
minus pressure gradient, or equivalent gravity acceleration mdpdx
, this is equivalent to add the gravity \displaystyle -\frac{\partial p}{\partial x} = -1 \displaystyle -\frac{\partial p}{\partial y} = 0
const face vector mdpdx[] = {-1,0};
note that in “accceleration” in “navier-stokes/centered.h” there is the fm
metric term in front.
event acceleration (i++,last)
uf.x[] = fm.x[]*(face_value (u.x, 0) + dt*a.x[]);
will be the same for alphav.x[] = fm.x[]/rho(ff);
next…
a = mdpdx;
Initialy at rest
foreach() {
u.x[] = 0;
u.y[] = 0;
p[]=1;
}
}
We check the number of iterations of the Poisson and viscous problems.
//event logfile (i++)
// fprintf (stderr, "%d %g %d %d\n", i, t, mgp.i, mgu.i);
old value of the velocity is saved
so that when it does not more change we are converged
event conv (t += 1; t < 150) {
double du = change (u.x, un);
fprintf(stdout,"t= %g %g %g %g \n",t,interpolate (u.x, L0/2, 0),interpolate (p, L0/2, 0),du);
if (i > 0 && du < 1.0e-6)
return 1; /* stop */
}
Implementation of the \mu(I) viscosity
event nonnewviscosity(i++) {
scalar eta_eq[];
computation of the second invariant as defined by Darby -II_2 = 2 D:D and D_2=\sqrt{D:D} \displaystyle 2 D:D = (2 [(\frac{\partial v}{\partial y})^2 + (\frac{ v}{ y})^2) +(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x})^2] + [\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}]^2) Note that y is r
so viscosity is \displaystyle \eta_{eq} = \mu(I)P/(\sqrt(2.)D2) with regularisation
scalar shear[];
foreach()
shear[] = fabs((u.x[0,1] - u.x[0,-1])/(2.*Delta));
boundary ({shear});
foreach() {
double mI2 = 0.,D2 = 0,In = 0, muI = 0;
dg = 1./30;
double duxx = (u.x[1,0] - u.x[-1,0])/(2 * Delta);
double duxy = (u.x[0,1] - u.x[0,-1])/(2 * Delta);
double duyx = (u.y[1,0] - u.y[-1,0])/(2 * Delta);
double duyy = (u.y[0,1] - u.y[0,-1])/(2 * Delta);
mI2 = sq(duyx+duxy) + 2*(sq(duyy) + sq(duxx) + sq(u.y[]/ max(y, 1e-20)));
D2 = sqrt(mI2/2.);
In = sqrt(2.)*dg*D2/sqrt(fabs(p[]));
//In = dg*shear[]/sqrt(fabs(P0));
muI = .38 + (.26)*In/(.3 + In);
if(D2>0){
eta_eq[] = min(muI*fabs(p[])/(sqrt(2.)*D2) , mumax );}
else {
eta_eq[]=mumax;
}
}
boundary ({eta_eq});
boundary ({mu_eq});
foreach_face() {
muv.x[] = fm.x[]*(eta_eq[] + eta_eq[-1,0])/2.;
}
boundary ((scalar *){muv});
}
Save profiles computed, shear and exact
event profiles (t += 1)
{
FILE * fp = fopen("xprof", "w");
scalar shear[];
foreach()
shear[] = (u.x[0,1] - u.x[0,-1])/(2.*Delta);
boundary ({shear});
for (double y = 0.; y < 1.0; y += 1./pow(2.,LEVEL))
fprintf (fp, "%g %g %g %g %g %g \n", y, interpolate (u.x, L0/2, y), interpolate (u.y, L0/2, y),
interpolate (shear, L0/2, y),interpolate (p, L0/2, y),
Uba(y));
fclose (fp);
}
We adapt according to the error on the velocity field.
event adapt (i++) {
fprintf (stderr," %g \n",t);
// adapt_wavelet ({u}, (double[]){3e-3,3e-3}, 8, 6);
}
event profile (t = end) {
foreach()
printf ("%g %g %g %g %g\n", x, y, u.x[], u.y[], p[]);
}
Compilation
make bagnoldtube.tst;
make bagnoldtube/plots;
make bagnoldtube.c.html;
Results and plots
Plot of the exact and computed velocities.
set ylabel "u(y)";set xlabel "y"
p[][-1:2]'xprof' t'u comp',''u 1:5 t'p','' u 1:($6/1.) t'exact' w l
Bibliography
R. Darby Viscoelastic fluids, Dekker ed. (1976) p 223-225, p 194